Nassau County District Attorney Kathleen Rice said Tuesday that
Hempstead Town Clerk Mark Bonilla had considered paying a female
subordinate $10,000 after she had filed a claim of sexual harassment
against him.
Bonilla was
arrested Friday after the Republican town clerk "attempted to obtain intimate photos" of the aforementioned subordinate.
However, according to
Newsday
[paid link], before attempting to obtain the photos, Bonilla "asked a
town attorney whether he could pay the woman $10,000 to make the
complaint 'go away.'"
At a news conference, Rice said the town attorney immediately
rejected the idea, and ordered Bonilla not to contact the woman who made
the complaint.
Bonilla, 50, pleaded not guilty Saturday to charges of official
misconduct, second-degree attempted coercion and petty larceny. The
charges are all misdemeanors.
A law enforcement source also told Newsday:
Three women in their 20s have made allegations "of a sexual nature" against Bonilla, describing a "hostile work environment."
The Bellmore resident has not yet confirmed whether or not he will resign from his position as town clerk.
Bonilla's story has been
making headlines at home after a neighbor allegedly shoved a news cameraman near of Bonilla's Bellmore.
With Matthew Hogan Become a blogger today!
Get started now
How about bringing the information to light yourself to prove and support your innocence rather then pay hush money. Thats in and of itself is JUST PLAIN WRONG on so many levels.
For the record, "paying off" was how it was reported. Mr. Bonilla supposedly looked into the possibility of a settlement, he never once offered the money. How about wanting this farce to end quickly for the sake of his family instead of dragging it on and on? Hush money was your phrase, not mine.
If this happened in business then his ass wouldhave been GRASS especially if a publicaly traded corp. YOU can lable it any way you want it is still HUSH MONEY- HUSH DONT TELL ANYONE If he is so ETHICALLY challenged to even consider doing something like this to dissuade his accusers EVEN if he is innocent then I HIGHLY question his JUDGEMENT or lack there of. He could be the best husband best father best neighbor, but a man who lacks ETHICS and good judgement should NOT be in public service. But it is not for me or you to decide it is up to a court of law to decide his vercity, and the truth of this debacle.
At best I think that Chairman Mao and the People's Republic are guilty of bad judgement using the Town Attorney to investigate anything.
Of more use would be to get Kate Murray out of office ASAP. SHE is the problem that affects all of us. Spend your energy there!
IF he had nothing to fear, he should have A)TOLD his wife and she should/would have counseled him to retain an attorney Rather claiming by paying off his accuser he was trying to SPARE her and his family this embarrassment. B) Retained a private cousel to advise him &to refute any claims as well as the charges he was being investigated and ultimately brought up on . whether guilty or innocent HIS ACTIONS are those of someone who has poor judgement . What I CARE about and am outraged with is the course of action he chose to take. He lacks GOOD judgement. THATS the issue i have with him ..Public figures who crumble and fumble under pressure dont belong in public office. He COMPTEMPLATED BRIBING SOMEONE> THAT alone is dispicable regardless of the reason or the spin you want to put on it. HUSH Money, Bribe, paying off, its all the same. even if this IT wasnt HIS attorney he didint seek his own counsel, he asked a TOWN attorney, compounding his
So now you are privy to conversations between Mr. Bonilla and his wife. He does have private counsel- the same attorney who said that Mr. Bonilla was inquiring about the possibility of a settlement from any possible lawsuit.
I have no political or financial interest in the “Patch,” but I would like to acknowledge their contribution to Long Island as a credible the news source, and for their complete and comprehensive coverage. They are the community pulse of Long Island.