The Nassau County Democrat and gun control advocate released a statement and did a round of interviews following the mass shooting at a Connecticut elementary school.
Rep. Carolyn McCarthy on Friday afternoon released a statement in the wake of the massacre of 20 school kids in Newtown, Conn.
Here is the text of the statement:
“Our
hearts go out to the victims and families from this horrific tragedy,
especially during the holidays when kids should be thinking about
presents and having fun with their families and friends, not America’s
deadly problem with gun violence.
“There
are a lot of unanswered questions right now, but one thing is clear –
there’s too much gun violence in our country. These shootings are
becoming all too common, and it’s too easy for dangerous people to get
the weapons that help them perform mass executions like today’s.
“Leaders
in Washington from both parties, and groups like the NRA, all say that
now is not the time to talk about how gun safety laws can save lives in
America. I agree, now is not the time to talk about gun laws – the time
for that conversation was long before all those kids in Connecticut
died today.
“We
owe it to our children to work harder to reduce gun violence. The
Second Amendment is the law of the land but it was never intended to
allow murderers to take the lives of innocent kids. It’s our moral
obligation as policymakers and as parents to do more to save lives.
“I
hope the President’s words about taking ‘meaningful action to prevent
more tragedies like this regardless of the politics’ stay true as we
continue down this road again.”
McCarthy
also conducted a series of interviews, including one on MSNBC and
another with Gail Collins of the New York Times. To read Collins'
column,
click here.Story by David Reich-Hale Become a blogger today!
Get started now
Watched this morning's CBS "Sunday Morning" show and after hearing your comments I can't help but respond positively to your points. Our minds are running awash as we ask, “What in the world can we do to help prevent these kinds of atrocities?” There is a way out that has been “out there” for over 35 years. In the past, we have witnessed hundreds of youngsters throughout grades K-12 become more “other-oriented” regularly looking for and itemizing the good and positive traits of their own classmates week after week and in some schools, year after year. I have just finished the book about the program. I have no desire whatsoever to make money on this book. All I want to do is get the word “out there.” Our students, year-after-year, the opportunity to become more “other-focused,” and implement the program as an official component of the curriculum, dynamic changes come about in the minds of children as they become centered on the good and positive attributes of each other. They are steered away from an ego-centric path. They learn to respect each other, understand each other, and develop positive and supportive relationships among each other. I write to you because you are in a better position than I am right now to get the word out there. I request that you use whatever platform you choose to help others take a look at this program. jamespirkle@hotmail.com
I have a cousin through marraige who has an autism spectrum disorder, along with early onset schizophrenia and who knows what else because they are not done diagnosing her or getting her meds right. Given the right circumstances, we could all see her doing something like this. Here's the problem - facility after facility will not keep her. There aren't many places designed for violent autistic schizophrenics. They kick her out when she threatens her life or the lives of others. Then she has to start all over from the beginning with a trip to the hospital with a psych consult. They keep telling her parents that the places for her ill not take her until she is an adult, in 3 years. Can she wait? Maybe. Can we all wait? I'm not sure. How are the institutions helping our mentally diseased children BEFORE they get the chance to do this?
It is pathetic that anyone so blatantly ignorant of something is given any credence whatsoever and is indicative of how twisted the media is, and how arrogant politicians are. It doesn't speak well of the electorate either.
Congresswoman McCarthy, please continue your years long struggle to get something done from very uncooperative politicians in Washington, DC.
Colin Ferguson boarded a Long Island commuter train and began shooting the passengers with a Ruger P-89 9mm pistol. The incident known as the Long Island Railroad Massacre resulted in six people being killed and 19 injured. If one person on that train had a handgun and carry permit they could have put a stop to Ferguson who just walked around shooting people at will with no one able to stop him.
http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2012/12/how-people-are-murdered-in-united-states.html
Feb 24, 2005 Smith County Court House Shooting: At the time of the shooting, Estrada and her son, David Hernandez Arroyo Jr., were entering the courthouse for a hearing regarding her ex-husband's failure to pay child support after their 2004 divorce. Estrada's lawyer later stated that his client did not believe her ex-husband to be dangerous. Arroyo, who had parked and lay in wait nearby the courthouse, approached his ex-wife and son on the steps outside the Smith County Courthouse and fired on them with a MAK-90, a semi-automatic rifle styled after the AK-47. Maribel Estrada was hit in the head and killed instantly, and Arroyo Jr. was hit in the leg and wounded. Both fell to the ground at the front courthouse steps. Nearby law enforcement and law enforcement officers already present at the courthouse responded to the initial shots and began exchanging fire with Arroyo. At this point, the law enforcement officers were only armed with pistols, and Arroyo was able to wound several and force them to retreat. A local resident, Mark Alan Wilson, was in his downtown loft when he heard the shooting begin. He looked out his window and saw Arroyo at the courthouse steps engaged in a shootout with law enforcement. Wilson, who held a Texas concealed handgun permit, immediately armed himself with his Colt .45 caliber pistol, and left his residence to intervene in the gun battle. Because Arroyo was already engaged in a heated gun battle with sheriff's deputies and Tyler police officers, he did not see Wilson approach from behind. As Wilson approached Arroyo from behind, Arroyo was taking aim at his son who he had already shot in the leg and wounded. Acting to defend the life of Arroyo's son, Wilson fired a round from approximately 50 feet which struck Arroyo in the back causing him to stumble and taking his attention away from his son. A witness who saw Wilson's round strike Arroyo reported seeing "white puffs of powder-like substance" come from Arroyo's clothing. This is believed to be the first time Arroyo was hit or injured during his attack on the courthouse. Wilson was forced to take cover behind Arroyo's truck in a prone position and exchanged fire with Arroyo. As Arroyo began to approach Wilson's position, he stood up from behind cover and fired again, hitting Arroyo. Unknown to Wilson, Arroyo was wearing a bulletproof vest, rendering Wilson's shots ineffective. Arroyo eventually fired a shot that struck Wilson, who faltered and fell from the view of witnesses, face down behind Arroyo's truck. Arroyo then walked up to Wilson and fired three more shots at him, killing him. [edit]
"hunting" anywhere in it and has absolutley nothing to do with hunting. That is just spin that the Left puts out, to distract from the real purpose of the Second Amendment. The 2nd Amendment has to do with protecting American Citizens from Gov't and politicians like our Vulture. That is why it was included in the Bill of Rights. It seems as necessary then, as it does right now.
As Judge Scalia explained in District of Columbia v Heller, the second amendment's right to bear arms "is not unlimited" and has never allowed anyone to "keep and carry any weapon whatsoever." Congress and the states can pass "laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms." They can prohibit the carrying of "dangerous and unusual weapons." And most importantly, "weapons that are most useful in military service—M-16 rifles and the like—may be banned..." for general civilian use. That's the law, folks. Congress can act to ban the kind of weapon that killed these poor innocent kids. You can have a gun for protection, you can have rifles for hunting, but please, accept common sense limits on assault weapons and large ammo clips.